These days there is a balloon floating over Delhi.It has nothing to do with the Commonwealth Games that are going on there.Instead, it is a trial balloon created and floated by a team of bunglers in Washington.I hope that the leadership in Delhi will puncture and let the air out of the balloon as soon as possible.
The trial balloon I am talking about is the proposal by Obama team offering to consider India's request for admission to UN Security Council as a permanent member in return for giving up Kashmir.While US global influence has been so miserably degraded that it does not even have the clout to override China's veto on this or any other matter, why would India even look at this proposal?
Long ago when the Eisenhover administration gave away to Kennedy presidency, John Foster Dulles, the ever paranoid anticommunist Secretary of State was being replaced by Dean Rusk who would keep the top diplomat job for the next eight years.Kennedy team wanted to bring China into the global community and they offered recognition to China on the basis that China would be "flexible" on the issues of Taiwan and Tibet.Chinese were smarter as they always have been and they told the Americans team to take a walk.Lyndon Johnson got involved in Vietnam and the overture towards China disappeared background.
When Nixon inherited the Vietnam mess and hired Henry Kissinger to manage his foreign policy, they both knew they were in a hole and would be unceremoniously thrown out of Vietnam with the Soviet Union gleefully watching their exit.Kissinger wanted to get out of the hole with minimal losses all the while trying to limit the gains by the Soviets, so he ended up reaching out to China.He and Nixon also wanted extract a price in the form of Chinawriting off Taiwan and Tibet.Chinese said, "No deal on Taiwan or Tibet. Not only that, we demand that youto stay out of our internal policies and let us sit in the permanent seat in Security Council with veto powers".US was in a mess, so the Chinese got everything they demanded.Chinese were smart to assess the situation rightly and negotiated wisely.
Today a significant contingent of his army is stuck in Iraq and likely to stay there for years to come.A larger contingent is in Afghanistan actively fighting with no hope of ever accomplishing any of their goals and anticipating an ignominious departure.They have to keep watching their back while Pakistan, their chief ally in their war on terrorism, claims to cooperate with them in their war on terrorism.With a Zombie economy at home President Obama will be visiting India in November when he would have lost his majority in the House of Representatives and may be even in the Senate. He will be in no position to offer much to India,instead, will be looking for help from India to bail him out.Need of the hour is for the Ministry of External Affairs is to recognize the present situation and study every step of the US-China negotiations in the 70's to learn from it.
What is happening in Kashmir is not a freedom struggle.It is the jihad staged by a small group of fanatic Islamists intending to create an Islamic state under Sahariah law financed by Saudi Arabia and choreographed by Pakistan.Compromise in Kashmir is a compromise on India's integrity.It will lead to the balkanization of India and reopening the door to the slavery that Hindus endured for eight hundred years.
Here is an unusual story of the association of Vishnu with a Muslim woman as his divine consort and worship services offered to her in Srirangam, a major temple in Tamilnadu.
In the temple in Srirangam,one of the largest and mostimportant in Tamilnadu, Vishnu is manifested as Ranganatha Swami in the reclining posture.There is also apainting of one "Tulukka Nachiar" (JYf;f ehr;rpahH) in a small shrine near the garbha-griha.Worship services are performed everyday in reverence to her in whichthe Lord Ranganatha is offered wheat bread, ghee and dhal for breakfast. (Tulukkar in Tamil means a Muslim, a word derived from "Turukiyar" or Turks, and Nachiyar is a term used in Tamil Vaishnava theology for the divine consort of the presiding deity).What follows is a fascinating story ofhow thispracticecame to be, a combination of history, legend and tradition.
When the first millennium of the Common Era was turning over to the second, Rajaraja Chola (985 - 1014 CE), the greatest of the Imperial Cholas was in power in Thanjavur in Tamilnadu.He established an empire which his son Rajendra Chola I (1012 - 1044 CE) expanded to include most of peninsular India, present day Orissa, Bihar, Bengal and Bangladesh and overseas possessions of present day Sri Lanka, theMalay peninsula, Indonesia and Thailand. Like other empires, this too did not last long.It began to disintegrate during the rule of Kulotthunga Chola (1071 - 1122 CE) and completely disappeared in 1279 CE when Rajendra Chola III lost the war with the Pandian king Maravarman Kulasekhara Pandian.That war brought most of what is the present day Tamilnadu under Pandian rule from their traditional capital at Madurai.After the death of the Pandian king in 1308 CE the succession struggle between his two sons (Jatavarman Sundara Pandian and Jatavarman Vira Pandian) reduced the kingdom to a state of civil war.Ultimately the prince Sundara Pandian, after loosing to his brother Vira Pandian, took a step that would radically change the history of Southern India for ever.
At this time the Muslims who hadinvaded India through the Northwest had established a Sultanate in Delhi and been ruling for over 100 years. They controlled most of northern India from Punjab to Bengal but they had not yet ventured into theSouth beyond theVindhya mountains.ThePrimary revenue for the Sultanate rulers had been from raiding the temples, local rajas and chiefs in addition to whatever they could extract from the poor farmers. The loosing Pandian prince traveled to Delhi and requested thatthe Sultan help him gain back his kingdom in Madurai.
The ruling Sultan in Delhi at the time was Allaudhin Khilji, considered to be one of the worst tyrants of the Slave Dynasties.During his earlier raid into Gujarat he had come across a Hindu slave whom he was attracted to (the Sultan was a homosexual) and purchased him. The slave was taken to Delhi, converted to Islam, given the name "Kafur" and made a personal attendant to the Sultan.Over course of time the slave Kafur became a right hand man to the Sultan and eventually grew to be a general in his army known as Malik Kafur.
With the knowledge gained from the fugitive Pandian prince, Malik Kafur led the military expedition through the present day Karnataka to Madurai in 1311 CE.He plundered all the places with any kind of wealth along the way. (This would was followed by subsequent raids and theeventual establishment of an Islamic Sultanate in Madurai in 1330 CE during the reign of Sultan Muhammed bin Tughlak. Pandian rulers fled to southern end of their territory, ruled as local chieftains in Tenkasi and slowly disappeared from history. The Sultanatelasted until 1380 CE when it was defeated and Hindu rule established under theVijayanagara Empire by Kumara Kampanna, the son of Bukka I, one of the cofounders of the empire).
Malik Kafur, on his way to Madurai stopped at Srirangam and plundered the temple.The temple establishment got the news of the expedition ahead of time and in their effort to save the worship Moorthi in the garbha graha (commonly known as moolavar) they covered the area with brick walls and made a confusing labyrinth inside the temple.Malik Kafur's army sacked Srirangam and the temple but did not find the garbha-griha.However, his army took away the Utsava Moorthi (smaller divine image used in festival processions) of Ranganatha made of gold along with other precious jewelry and valuables. His army also plundered other temples including those at Chidamparam and Madurai and returned to Delhi with untold wealth which even caused a temporary inflation in Delhi's economy.Upon viewing the loot,Sultan's daughter fell in love with the Utsavamoorthi of Ranganatha and kept it all for herself.
According to legend, one woman from Srirangam, not wanting to loose sight of the Utsavamoorthi, followed Malik Kafur's army all the way to Delhi and returned to Srirangam to inform temple authorities where it had ended up.For this she was given the name "woman who followed" (gpd;nrd;wty;yp). Guided by the woman, a team of parijanas (temple attendants) traveled to Delhi to bring back the Utsavamoorthi. After reaching Delhi, with the temple singers in the fore with their performance,they were able toplease Sultan Khilji who offered them presents.The singers, refusing the presents, asked for the Utsava Moorthi of Ranganatha which the Sultan obliged. The devotees returned to Srirangam and resumed their ritual practices with whatever available resources.
Legend also has that theSultan's daughter had fallen in love with the Utsavamoorthy (or Ranganatha?) and traveled all the way to Srirangam since she wantedto be close her beloved.She was known in Srirangam as Surathani, a corruption of "Sultani".Surathani died shortly after reaching the temple, supposedly at the feet of Ranganatha. (Her death would invite more raids from Delhi but that is the story for another day).She was accepted by the temple devotees as a divine consort of Ranganatha and is known as Thulukka Nachiyar.There isashrine with the painting of Surathani in the temple as a standing testimony to this tradition. This tradition is preserved in a Telugu folk song called the "Surathani Kalyanamu".
This tradition has spread beyond Srirangam.During the annual Chithirai festival in Madurai, Kallalagar, a manifestation of Vishnu, travels to Madurai to attend the wedding of his sister Meenakshi to Lord Sundareswarar who are the presiding deities there.After crossing the nearby Vaigai river, tradition holds that he spends a night with Thulukka Nachiyar before he gets to the divine wedding function. The tradition is also present in the Thiru Narayana temple at Melukote in Karnataka where the Muslim princess is known as Bivi Nachiyar.
During the last three days there were two news items which specially caught my interest.
1. A powerful politician, while talking to press in New Delhi on Saturday (7/24/2010), said that the Popular Front of India (PFI) was aiming to convert Kerala into a “Muslim country” in the next 20 years. PFI is a Muslim organization which hit the headlines recently after its activists chopped off the hand of a college lecturer for allegedly insulting prophet Muhammad.Using unusually harsh language, the Chief Minister said the PFI was pumping money to lure youth into Islam and persuade them to marry Muslim women(1). “Their strategy is to make Muslims a majority community in Kerala. In 20 years, they want to make Kerala a Muslim majority state," he said referring to recent cases of Love Jihad.
These words were not spoken by any member of BJP or RSS.They were spoken by Mr.V.S.Achuthanandan, a Communist Party (Marxist) leader and the Chief Minister of Kerala! Indian Express reported(2): His party, CP(M), has leading role in nurturing this monster - Popular Front - it has earlier used the PFI to divert votes from the Congress-allied Indian Union Muslim League. However, there isn’t a shred of doubt that the PFI, or a significant strand of it, is an extremist and violent organization that has not let go of its SIMI antecedents. Through the ’90s, after the Babri Masjid demolition polarized India, the PFI (formerly the National Development Front) grew and tightened its grip — it specializes in acts of shocking brutality, like the incident when it hacked off the hands of the college lecturer, for supposedly insulting the Prophet in an examination paper. It has a repressive social agenda, from demanding headscarves in Christian schools to moral policing, along with a media mouthpiece and softer outreach activities. In northern Kerala, where it is locked in fierce competition with the RSS and the CPM, it has developed a neat line in political intimidation. That it seeks to impose its social ideology on Kerala’s Muslims is a clearly visible fact.
For many years on, the BJP has been raising this issue in Kerala, but they were marginalized, and neither Congress nor CP(M) wanted to confront the reality of foreign funded talibanization of the society in Kerala. All communal incidents were squarely blamed on the RSS/BJP, and politics of appeasement was allowed to prosper. Now, in this late hour, people are sitting up and taking notice. We will have to see how much follow up in done on the statement by the Chief Minister and the CP(M). This may only be a lip-service to shore up Hindu votes as CP(M) has become unpopular among the other communities in Kerala of late.
BJP and Congress criticized the Chief Minister for being "communal".Surprise, BJP calling CP(M) communal for raising Talibanization issue?There are hypocrites in Indian politics everywhere you look.
All the Islamic organizations, as they always do, condemned the Chief Minister, wanted him to apologize and retract his statements.Islamic ethos has no room for self-introspection, and as always, they stand to defend the brand name of Islam regardless of whether the issue is right or wrong.
***
2.Mr. Manishankar Aiyar, currently a Rajya Sabha member and Congress party leader, said that he would be “unhappy” if the upcoming Commonwealth Games in Delhi turn out to be a success and that those organizing it are “evil.”He further said: "I am delighted in a way because rains are causing difficulties for the Commonwealth Games. Basically, I will be very unhappy if the Games are successful because then they will start bringing Asian Games, Olympic Games,” he said. And added: “Those who are patronizing the Games can only be evil. They cannot be God."(3).
Mr. Aiyar's acquaintance with Rajiv Gandhi during his years at DoonSchool and CambridgeUniversity got him a berth among the Congress party establishment. A rabid Marxist who is against any kind of development, he was the Sports Minister in the year 2006-2009.That shows why India has been doing so poorly in international sports. When he was a student at CambridgeUniversity he was an active member of Marxist Society there and supposedly collected donations to help China win its war against India in 1962.With such antinational traitors in power, no wonder India is spinning its wheels when it comes to progress.
Indian external affairs minister S.M. Krishna traveled to Islamabad last week for talks with Pakistani Foreign Minister Qureshi and returned empty handed. Pakistan, as usual, played the victim of India's alleged intransigence. Three days later Hillary Clinton, the U.S. Secretary of State came to Islamabad carrying goodies ($500 million as first installment of the $7.5 billion) and presided over a meeting between Pakistan and Afghanistan where they signed a transit agreement between the two countries that specifically excluded any shipment of Indian goods to Afghanistan through Pakistani territory. I find it mind-numbing to see such clumsiness of our External Affairs ministry.
Qureshi knew ahead of time that Hillary Clinton was to visit Islamabad begging and bribing Pakistan for its support in Afghanistan and push Karzai to sign the Af-Pak agreement. With this knowledge, Qureshi had no interest in reaching any agreement with India and he wanted to show that Pakistanis can beat India in diplomacy and check-mate India. Our diplomats in South Block were clueless when they traveled to Islamabad.
India had strategic discussions with United States last month and it is not clear if anything was accomplished. If those talks were successful, why would Clinton come to Islamabad with goodies so soon after the breakdown of talks between Qureshi and Krishna and preside over Af-Pak agreement which disenfranchised India in Afghanistan? All the development works that India did in Afghanistan over the last several years have come to nothing.
Indian team had so many trump cards in their hands(1,2): the ISI involvement in the 11/26 attack in Mumbai as revealed by Headley, the information of Pakistani Navy frogmen training the Mumbai terrorists, ISI providing money to LeT to purchase the boat to travel from Karachi to Mumbai, the ISI being in control and coordinating the attack from the beginning to the end, ISI colluding with Haqqani network, the notorious group which raised alarm in the US Senate last week, and on and on. If Pakistan is not responsive to these many evidences, is there any use in talking to them? So called "soft power" that Congress politicians talk about does not work beyond our borders (it never worked even within the borders).
Indians are under a stupid assumption that the dream of a prosperous India cannot be realized without a peace agreement with Pakistan. Pakistan knows this very well and is carrying out its usual blackmail as it has been doing for the last sixty years. By the manner in which they handled the talks they essentially declared that they have no interest in a working relationship with India on mutual terms because of their confidence that United States would bankroll them and China would provide diplomatic support. It is about time to wake up from the our Gandhian day dreams and face up to the world of realpolitik.
It is crunch time for Indian diplomats in Afghanistan.The United States has woken up to the reality that their mission to create a Jeffersonian democracy over there is a lost cause. Even when it was a monarchy years ago the state of Afghanistan did not have strong Kabul-centered rule but a loose coalition of tribal leaders running the countryside and US military will not be able to change that.President Obama, in spite of his silver tongued ideological speeches, is just another political animal. He does not want to carry a liability even a minute longer than he has to.His advisors are recommending that he unload Afghanistan ASAP and they know that people's memory is short.Very soon the US will wash its hands off Afghanistan and the place is about to descent into its usual chaos.If Indian diplomacy functions like business as usual, India will be the looser and the winner will be Pakistan.
Pakistan eagerly working hard to take over the vacuum created by the exit of United States and getting handsomely paid for it.United States did use Pakistan some thirty years ago to get the Russians out.Pakistan managed the war all the while raising Taliban terrorists to send to Kashmir, Chechnya and Bosnia with the bills being paid by the United States. The US administration could care less about Taliban or terrorism as long as it did not affect them.The situation is about to repeat.It puts Pakistan in an excellent financial and strategic position as they can enlarge their terror camps to Afghanistan and continue to terrorize the neighborhood on a grander scale.
In such situation the looser is India because its internal security is further endangered and the infrastructure work it did in Afghanistan will come to nothing.All the goodwill that India accumulated with the current Afghan administration will be lost under the new regime which will be of Pakistan's choosing.
The mistakes committed by the United States in the 80's and Pakistan taking advantage of them created huge security problems for India. We hope that Indian diplomats will be working overtime to ensure it does not happen again.
Those who do not learn from history are cursed to suffer repetition.
When you deal with an adversary, first you should learn his mindset and objectives and then his strengths and weaknesses.You do not think in terms of justice because what is just to you is not necessarily just to the other party.You negotiate giving higher priority to your own objectives than his.When you make a concession, make sure that the adversary pays an appropriate price.If you give away something for nothing, he will assume that it is worth nothing and will demand more.Make him earn it while staying within the framework of your own objectives.Indian polity forgot these lessons while dealing with Pakistan and India is paying a heavy price for nurturing Pakistani bad behavior. In every war with Pakistan the Indian military gained strategic ground only to be given away by the politicians in Delhi for nothing in return.
Pakistan is an Islamic state by design and not by accident.Islam is in the consciousness of every Pakistani, whether soldier, mullah, trader or a taxi driver.Over the last sixty years the Pakistani consensus has been to become more Islamic, whatever that may be, in social, political, economic and judicial spheres.As it is the case in other Muslim majority countries, Islam is simultaneously a religious and a political force in Pakistan.Like other Islamic populations, Pakistanis have found it difficult to establish or retain a modern state.Due to Pakistani intolerance to dissent the Ahmadiyyas are classified as second class citizens.They have indulged to fabricate a delusional history to deny anything good in Indian subcontinent until the arrival of Islam and passing it to successive generations.
Majority of Muslims in colonial India didnot participate in the Independence Struggle.The fanatic ones argued that, if they could not rule over Hindus, then they had to be shielded from Hindu influence, not by becoming a separate but equal society, but a separate nation altogether.Even after the creation of Pakistan they have not reconciled to the idea of major chunk of territory that was under Mughal rule functioning under a secular political system.
Pakistan is a nation of several ethnic groups (Punjabis, Sindhis, Baluchis and Pashtuns) broken into several linguistic groups and religious sects, each with conflicting ideals and separatist tendencies.But they are ruled by an uncompromising central authority.The nation is constantly trying to solve the puzzle reconciling the differences in permutations of state, religion and a dysfunctional oligarchic political order. A solution that will lead the country to be a modern peaceful society is not likely to emerge in the near future. The educational system is so dismal that the masses of youth completing their studies in madrassas do not have the skills to be competitive in the modern global economy.The Military Staff colleges offer their students stereotyped theories of Indian motives and strategy. The cantonments are thick with reminders of past battles and fallen comrades and every year the units muster for regimental and unit memorial ceremonies, each officer being reminded that he may have to make the ultimate sacrifice against imagined aggression by India. Any civilian government that takes a bold step in new direction especially in foreign policy must have army’s consent, or it will be dismissed from the office.Therefore, it is unlikely that any civilian government that reaches a peace agreement with India will be able to gain its approval from its own society or military.
Anyone who believes that a resolution to Kashmir issue will bring peace between the two countries is only day-dreaming.Even if there is a settlement on Kashmir issue favorably disposed to Pakistani side, we cannot expect peace. In the Pakistani psyche the claim extends to the entire land where Aurangazeb ruled and Kashmir is only a placeholder to keep the issue alive.It is the superiority of the Indian military forces that has kept the Pakistani military adventurers outside India's borders. Now they have resorted to terrorism against civilian population.We should remember that Nehru signed the Indus water treaty in 1960 giving away the waters of all the rivers except Sutlej, but within a short periodPakistan sent its army into Rann of Kutch and Kashmir resulting in the war of '65.
Priority for the Indian political establishment is to protect its borders, state and citizens. Economically, diplomatically and militarily India is in a better position and there is no need to push for unproductive peace overtures that go nowhere.Further, the political machinery in Pakistan is highly unstable and durability of any agreement is doubtful.We need to keep our own national security as the top objective and put the peace negotiations in cold storage until the time when Pakistanis realize that they cannot reach a secure nationhood until they cast realism in their national objectives.If and when such realization materializes they will approach India in their own interest to normalize the relationship
British are waking up, at last.They revoked the visa to Zakir Naik and banned his entry into Britain.He was scheduled to give a series of lectures in London and Sheffield.Ms.Theresa May, British Home Secretary, said: "Numerous comments made by Dr. Naik are evidence to me of his unacceptable behavior".
Those of you who do not know Zakir Naik, he is a Mumbai based fanatic Islamic preacher, often on the road, giving fiery lectures bragging about the Islamic religion and berating all the other religions.Just go to you-tube and put his name in the search box, you will see a number of clips with his hate speech.
Here is the excerpt form one of his many you-tube clips:"...You heard the Muslims saying Osama Bin Laden is right or wrong. I reject them ... We don't know. But if you ask my view, if this is the truth, if he is fighting the enemies ofIslam.I am for him. I don't know what he's doing. I'm not in touch with him. I don't know him personally. I read the newspaper. If he is terrorizing the terrorists, if he is terrorizing America the terrorist, the biggest terrorist, I am with him ... The thing is, if he's terrorizing a terrorist, he's following Islam"(1).Other incendiary remarks include: "Muslims in India would prefer the Islamic criminal law to be implemented on all Indians since it is the most practical".
When will Indian government get the courage to shut down this hate monger?
India's political situation is pathetic in the international arena.It does not look any betterdomestically either but that is the subject for another day.India has one sixth of the world population but it has no representation in UN Security Council which operates with fifteen members.It has not held even the rotating membership in the last eighteen years.Pakistan, a terrorist state, has held a seat as recently as 2004.Even miserable Bangladesh had a seat at the council in 2001. India has been kept out far too long.
Pakistan, in spite of all the terrorism that it exports, is a "strategic partner" of the United States in fighting terrorism.Further, Pakistan gets handsomely paid for being the "strategic partner" and is provided with modern weapons with which it can threaten India. It tries to wield a veto power over India's aid projects in Afghanistan and routinely sends terrorists to attack Indian interests there and everywhere else.In spite of the numerous Pakistani terrorist attacks inflicted on Indian soil the world paid no attention until US and Europe began to suffer similar fate.
Casual world opinion is that India is occupying Kashmir illegally and would like a plebiscite but nobody except Indians seem to know that Pakistan is illegally occupying a large chunk of Kashmir from where they have ethnically cleansed out all Hindus and Sikhs.Though the UN resolution states that the plebiscite can take place only after both India and Pakistan withdraw their troops from Kashmir, the focus is only on India to withdraw its troops.There is the Gilgit area of north western Kashmir which Pakistan has occupied and conveniently renamed it as "Northern Areas" that even Indian government seems to have washed off its hands.In such a world, what kind of security does an Indian citizen have, how secure is India's sovereignty and how safe are India's borders? Indian newspapers routinely editorialize about the "violation of human rights by Indian army and police" when the borders are not secure and internal security tenuous. During the siege in Mumbai at the Taj Mahal hotel by Pakistani terrorists in November of 2008 the Time Magazine's South Asia correspondent, Aryn Baker(a) had the arrogance to advocate for the bigots in Pakistan longing for "the golden era of the Mughal period in the 1700s and has a fervent desire to see India, Pakistan and Bangladesh reunited under Islamic rule".As if Hindus do not deserve human rights.
Three countries stayed out of Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, namely India, Pakistan and Israel, and all three have nuclear weapons.Nobody in the West would even dare to suggest that Israel gives up its nuclear weapons.Columnists in the West routinely write about India and Pakistan holding nuclear weapons and the need to strip them of those weapons.Of the two, everyone knows which one exports terrorism and nuclear weapon technology. But even US does not have access to the top Pakistani proliferator, A.Q.Khan, in spite of all the billions that they are giving as bribe and blood money.But President Obama wanted to scuttle the Indo-US Commercial nuclear treaty that President Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh worked out.Now, China is proposing to sell nuclear reactors to Pakistan in clear violation of commercial nuclear materials and equipment treatywhile Obama and his state department are looking the other way.They very well remember that China owns a over two trillion dollars ofUS Treasury bonds and currency and it can sink the US dollar and economy overnight.It is not just Obama, there is a big business by a crowd of do-gooders who warned against Indo-US nuclear treaty, including New York Times and Gary Milholin of Wisconsin Project, but one does not hear these people uttering a word about the China-Pakistan deal.When it comes to their own economy, every country, including the mighty United States, becomes flexible with their principles and ideologies.
Is there justice in the world?Only fools and liberal Indian commentators would raise such a silly question. Of course, there is justice, but only on the terms of the mighty and strong.For the weak to survive in this world they need wisdom which Indian polity sadly lacks.We Indians are Gandhi's children, we always look out for the other guy and our dharma is to let our enemy hold our neck in a noose so that he feels safe and secure.Our intellectuals talk about a "just solution to Kashmir problem with Pakistan" as if Pakistan ever cared for a just solution.Pakistan's wish is to bring back the Moghul empire and claim ownership to every piece of real estate where Aurangazeb ruled. Some talk about mediation through a "disinterested third party" as if such an entity exists.There is no disinterested third party, every country in this world has an agenda with underlying self interest.We proudly talk about our non-violence, secularism and equality as if the rest of the world cares about all these.We live in a dog eat dog world, and when it comes to implementing a foreign policy, wise leaders put self interest ahead of ideology.Gandhi and his Congress followers including Nehru never realized this fact, and basically this ignorance is the root cause all the security problems that India is facing in its borders as well as in its international relations.Until India's polity realizes that its self interest ought to consistently command higher priority over the so called justice and ideology the forces to balkanize India will ever more be active and might even succeed.Just remember, Amnesty International is not going to stop Pakistani terrorists or guarantee our borders, our own security establishment has to do that.
I plan to be writing about India's internal and external politics, diplomacy and security interests on a regular basis. I welcome readers to give me feed back.
Reference:
(a) -Aryn Baker, "India's Muslims in Crisis", Time Magazine,November 27, 2008
